Showing posts with label SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION 2015. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION 2015. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

SEO - Pagination with rel=�next� and rel=�prev�

Much like rel=�canonical� acts a strong hint for duplicate content, you can now use the HTML link elements rel=�next� and rel=�prev� to indicate the relationship between component URLs in a paginated series. Throughout the web, a paginated series of content may take many shapes�it can be an article divided into several component pages, or a product category with items spread across several pages, or a forum thread divided into a sequence of URLs. Now, if you choose to include rel=�next� and rel=�prev� markup on the component pages within a series, you�re giving Google a strong hint that you�d like us to:

Consolidate indexing properties, such as links, from the component pages/URLs to the series as a whole (i.e., links should not remain dispersed between page-1.html, page-2.html, etc., but be grouped with the sequence).
Send users to the most relevant page/URL�typically the first page of the series.



The relationship between component URLs in a series can now be indicated to Google through rel=�next� and rel=�prev�.

Outlining your options

Here are three options for a series:
Leave whatever you have exactly as-is. Paginated content exists throughout the web and we�ll continue to strive to give searchers the best result, regardless of the page�s rel=�next�/rel=�prev� HTML markup�or lack thereof.
If you have a view-all page, or are considering a view-all page, see our post on View-all in search results.
Hint to Google the relationship between the component URLs of your series with rel=�next� and rel=�prev�. This helps us more accurately index your content and serve to users the most relevant page (commonly the first page). Implementation details below.

Implementing rel=�next� and rel=�prev�

If you prefer option 3 (above) for your site, let�s get started! Let�s say you have content paginated into the URLs:

http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=1
http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=2
http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=3
http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=4

On the first page, http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=1, you�d include in the <head> section:
<link rel="next" href="http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=2" />

On the second page, http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=2:
<link rel="prev" href="http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=1" />
<link rel="next" href="http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=3" />

On the third page, http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=3:
<link rel="prev" href="http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=2" />
<link rel="next" href="http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=4" />

And on the last page, http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=4:
<link rel="prev" href="http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=3" />

A few points to mention:
The first page only contains rel=�next� and no rel=�prev� markup.
Pages two to the second-to-last page should be doubly-linked with both rel=�next� and rel=�prev� markup.
The last page only contains markup for rel=�prev�, not rel=�next�.
rel=�next� and rel=�prev� values can be either relative or absolute URLs (as allowed by the <link> tag). And, if you include a <base> link in your document, relative paths will resolve according to the base URL.
rel=�next� and rel=�prev� only need to be declared within the <head> section, not within the document <body>.
We allow rel=�previous� as a syntactic variant of rel=�prev� links.
rel="next" and rel="previous" on the one hand and rel="canonical" on the other constitute independent concepts. Both declarations can be included in the same page. For example, http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=2&sessionid=123 may contain:

<link rel="canonical" href="http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=2�/>
<link rel="prev" href="http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=1&sessionid=123" />
<link rel="next" href="http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=3&sessionid=123" />

rel=�prev� and rel=�next� act as hints to Google, not absolute directives.
When implemented incorrectly, such as omitting an expected rel="prev" or rel="next" designation in the series, we'll continue to index the page(s), and rely on our own heuristics to understand your content.


Read the full article here : LINK

Thanks to Webmaster Digital and Google for the info

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Google Mobilegeddon Algorithm Update




"Mobilegeddon could be bad news for 40% of top websites"

USATODAY.com


Mobilegeddon has arrived. Google today updated its algorithm to rank sites it labels as �mobile-friendly� higher on mobile search results. Because the company�s search engine drives so much traffic, many are worrying, panicking, and even calling the update �Mobilegeddon� (a not-so-clever play on the terms Mobile and Armageddon).


Is that your site Mobile Friendly ? Test It Here
How it will affect ?

This means that people who use Google to search on their smartphone may not find many of their favorite sites at the top of the rankings. Sites that haven't updated could find themselves ranked way lower, which in turn could mean a huge loss of business

So who all uses a mobile for Searching?

  • 46% of Searchers Now Use Mobile Exclusively to Research
  • New Google research says that 50 percent of mobile users are most likely to visit after conducting a local search, while 34 percent of consumers on tablets or computers will go to a store.



Thanks for the info : 
+Santhosh Thomas 
sandotnet.blogspot.in


Separate SEO URL words with a hyphen, or an underscore?

The recurring question in SEO URLs is whether to use a hyphen, or dash, (these-are-hyphens) or an underscore (these_are_underscores) to separate your words. Does Google recognize both of them as word separators?

The short answer is that you should use a hyphen for your SEO URLs. Google treats a hyphen as a word separator, but does not treat an underscore that way. Google treats and underscore as a word joiner � so red_sneakers is the same as redsneakers to Google. This has been confirmed directly by Google themselves, including the fact that using dashes over underscores will have a (minor) ranking benefit.

Again, SEO URLs should use hyphens to separate words. Do not use underscores, do not try to use spaces, and do not smash all the words together intoonebigword. As of 2012, dashes are still the best way to optimize your SEO URLs.



Credits : ecreativeim 

Sunday, April 19, 2015

In 2015, Your Job As An SEO Isn�t Actually SEO


Regardless, the title is accurate � in a sense. Yes, you are still responsible for driving organic traffic. That isn�t going anywhere. But because the way to drive organic traffic isn�t anything like the way we used to drive organic traffic, SEOs have to become more cross-functional. These days, when you say you �do SEO,� you really do about a million other things that historically aren�t considered SEO.

If that�s the case, then what else is in our job description?

Content Developer
This part of an SEO�s job should not come as a surprise to you given how ingrained �content is king� has become in our heads.


There is no way you can rank well in search engines without good content, and I see more copywriters being directly integrated into the SEO team rather than living on a different team. In many cases, the requirements of being a non-technical SEO now include content writing.

Quality content can be hard to create; it�s not exactly something you can teach. There�s no formula you can follow (although Nate Dame does have a pretty good list of what makes quality content), and it does take a lot of time (I�ve spent 15 minutes on one Facebook post), so don�t assume that good content is something we just have lying around.

User Experience Advocate
SEO and user experience (UX) got off on the wrong foot, and I blame SEO. The spammy things we were doing years ago to manipulate the algorithm were the furthest thing from a good user experience, so it�s no wonder UX professionals hated us.

Things are totally different now. Search engines want to see what users want to see.

Though Google hasn�t come out to say that good UX impacts your search rankings, there�s a lot of speculation that it will be adding mobile UX into its algorithm. That means that if you want to drive more organic traffic to a page, that page has to provide a good user experience.

Digital Strategists
Over the past year or so, I�ve noticed a fundamental change in how SEOs operate � specifically the marketing side of SEO, not the technical side.

We�re becoming more thinkers than doers. Instead of taking direction from what others have decided will change on the site, we�re getting more involved in shaping that conversation. If you�re not, then you need to push to be.

We spend so much time on the site and so much time obsessing over every data point on how customers are using our site that it�s completely fair to say we know what�s best for the site. Of course, I�m not advocating for SEOs to be the sole decision maker, but SEO today means playing a larger role in overall site strategy, and that�s something we need to be prepared for.

Unfortunately, there are still a lot of people who view SEO in a silo, so it�s up to us to not pigeonhole ourselves into just keyword research or title tag updates.

Creative Marketer
It used to be so easy to get links: a few directory listings, some press release submissions, a handful of articles posted to EzineArticles. Mindless work, yes, but boy was it easy.

There is definitely no such thing as easy link now. Every link, whether manually or organically acquired, requires a lot of thought and a little bit of work, and we have to be more creative in the way we�re getting links.

Instead of �building links,� we�re building things people naturally want to link to, and that�s forcing SEOs to think more like marketers. What does our target audience want?

Thinking like this, you�re not creating SEO campaigns or link building campaigns; you�re creating marketing campaigns that build brand awareness, boost social mentions, generate PR buzz and yeah, builds some links. Here are some great examples;

The You vs. John Paulson campaign MahiFX ran in 2011 (Moz has a good write-up of the case study).

Expedia�s Find Yours Campaign � 68 linking root domains (LRDs), 196 total links, ~1,000 social shares.

Froont�s brilliant GIFS about responsive design � 273 LRDs, 2,473 total links, ~11,000 social shares.

Union�s employee appreciation day � 56 LRDs, 468 total links, ~12,00 social shares. (Sadly, the Vimeo link got all the action, but all the press buzz secured a handful of home page links.)

Obviously, you can�t run things like the above by yourself. You�re going to have to rely on other departments � and that brings me to probably the most important job of any SEO in 2015�.

Cheerleader
One of my boss� favorite sayings is, �The best SEO�s will put themselves out of a job.� While that�s not exactly motivating me to be the best SEO (I kid), the point is that the best SEOs have done such a good job at educating other teams on SEO that, after a while, there doesn�t need to be someone advocating for �right thing for SEO� because that�s naturally been weaved into the fabric of every digital professional�s job.

Do I think we�re ever going to get to that point? Not in the next 10 years, but the fact remains that SEO in theory isn�t hard, no matter how many people try to tell you it�s a Jedi magic trick.

Everything you do online could have some effect on your organic traffic, so SEOs have to rely on other teams to understand how their actions affect our KPIs. You have to rally these evangelists in creative, in social media, in development, in IT, and in copywriting, educating them on how what they do is actually SEO. That�s the only way you�re going to be able to meet your goals.



Thanks to search engine land and Erin Everhart for the post

Friday, March 13, 2015

Domain Authority?


Matt Cutts� announcement heralds the end of an area, really, because quick-fire guest blogging was one of the last vaguely acceptable techniques by which one could quickly manipulate rankings. While Google�s tougher stance has got some online marketers upset, others have applauded Cutts for tightening up this final area in which wild-west-SEO�ers could ply their trade. Now, almost for the first time since the birth of the internet, the playing field has begun to level out. Webmasters who put time and effort into their design, online communities and content creation are going to set the standard from now on.

What is domain Authority?
Domain authority is a measure of the power of a domain name and is one of many search engine ranking factors. Domain authority is based on three factors: Age, Popularity, and Size.

SEO gurus Moz can be credited with the metric known as DA or domain authority. Moz�s own search algorithm gauges the quality of any given site based on a huge complex combination of factors including onsite and offsite, taking in to account things such as diversity of Backlinking domains to come up with a score between 0 and 100. A brand new site, for example, will have 0 whereas a very high authority site might have 80/100. Domain Authority gives those working in the field of online marketing a useful metric by which to consider the apparent quality of any site.

Do read it here: http://codeboxr.com/blogs/why-domain-authority-is-most-important-for-seo-3